- Ptycka
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Vietovė: Honolulu
- Registravosi: 2008-12-04
- Žinutės: 6275
- Atsiliepimai: 9
#11101 2013-03-20 17:27
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Loading rašė:
venckiene.
Neprisijungęs
- olegaskimanas
- 1 gramas gyvuliniu baltymu...
- Registravosi: 2008-06-06
- Žinutės: 6087
- Atsiliepimai: 26
#11102 2013-03-20 18:03
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Pusei Lietuvos Uspaschikas
Neprisijungęs
- Eternity
- Dažnas dalyvis
- Vietovė: Vilnius
- Registravosi: 2013-03-08
- Žinutės: 239
- Atsiliepimai: 0
#11103 2013-03-20 18:21
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Ptycka rašė:
Pilieciai, jusu nuomone , kurie manipulatoriai yra ryskiausi , zinomiausi pasaulyje?
Cia kaip pvz Obama, galbut Napaleonas ir t.t
Cia gal kalbejimui ruosies?
Neprisijungęs
- eNrr
- Aesthetix
- Registravosi: 2011-01-19
- Žinutės: 7715
- Atsiliepimai: 37
#11104 2013-03-20 18:23
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Joa, čia jis kalbą ruošia. Pirmadienį man atrodo visiems abiturientams bus. Metas ir man prisėsti prie to
Neprisijungęs
- 159159
- Rusų ambasados apmokamas komentatorius
- Registravosi: 2010-11-18
- Žinutės: 10805
- Įspėjimai: 3
- Atsiliepimai: 24
#11105 2013-03-20 18:42
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
šiandien man buvo, atsipimpalavęs jau kaip sakant
Neprisijungęs
- eNrr
- Aesthetix
- Registravosi: 2011-01-19
- Žinutės: 7715
- Atsiliepimai: 37
#11106 2013-03-20 19:01
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Mes apie dvyliktos klasės, o tu turbūt apie PUPP'ą?
Neprisijungęs
- Evaldas1994
- Dažnas dalyvis
- Vietovė: kaunas
- Registravosi: 2011-10-14
- Žinutės: 275
- Atsiliepimai: 1
#11107 2013-03-20 19:34
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
as ir kalba kalu ir tema manipuliavimas
Paskutinį kartą taisė Evaldas1994 (2013-03-20 23:39)
Neprisijungęs
- MrBurbulas
- Shy Gym Rat
- Registravosi: 2011-07-11
- Žinutės: 12860
- Atsiliepimai: 23
#11108 2013-03-20 19:36
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Evaldas1994 rašė:
as ir kalba kalu
ir tema manipulevimas
manipuLIAvimas
Neprisijungęs
- lolardas
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Vietovė: Miškas
- Registravosi: 2007-07-08
- Žinutės: 10855
- Įspėjimai: 1
- Atsiliepimai: 19
#11109 2013-03-20 19:37
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
kažkoks tu netolerantiškas tautinėm mažumom
Neprisijungęs
- MrBurbulas
- Shy Gym Rat
- Registravosi: 2011-07-11
- Žinutės: 12860
- Atsiliepimai: 23
#11110 2013-03-20 19:38
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
lolardas rašė:
kažkoks tu netolerantiškas tautinėm mažumom
:DDDDDDDDDDDD
Neprisijungęs
- Ptycka
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Vietovė: Honolulu
- Registravosi: 2008-12-04
- Žinutės: 6275
- Atsiliepimai: 9
#11111 2013-03-20 20:01
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Taip tapati:) sake klaus klausimu papildomai kodel pasirinkai ir kokius oratorius zinai.
Neprisijungęs
- ATjr
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Registravosi: 2011-10-02
- Žinutės: 7356
- Įspėjimai: 1
- Atsiliepimai: 21
#11112 2013-03-20 20:05
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
lolardas rašė:
kažkoks tu netolerantiškas tautinėm mažumom
Neprisijungęs
- Ptycka
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Vietovė: Honolulu
- Registravosi: 2008-12-04
- Žinutės: 6275
- Atsiliepimai: 9
#11113 2013-03-20 20:44
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Ka manot?
Whether we like it or not, genetics play a monumental role in bodybuilding. For all those people saying that complaining about bad genetics is simply an excuse for poor effort or lack of progress... they really don't know the physiology behind it. Although admittedly, many times people do prematurely blame everything on genetics when it is in fact simply a lack of effort or knowledge.
The only muscle fibers with potential for tangible hypertrophy are type II anaerobic fibres. These are the fibres responsible for short powerful bursts of energy utilizing primarily the ATP-Phosphocreatine energy system. The percentage of your muscle composed of type II fibres (fast twitch, anaerobic) vs type I fibres (slow twitch, oxidative) is entirely determined genetically. Ever noticed that some people are born with a natural propensity for strength/power sports whereas others are naturally better at endurance sports? This is determined by the ratio of fast twitch to slow twitch fiber content in your skeletal muscles. Another thing to keep in mind is that skeletal muscle cells do not undergo mitosis, which means that they do not replicate or produce new cells. This means you cannot change the fibre content of your muscle from what you are genetically born with. Athletic and resistance training can only increase the size of existing type II skeletal muscle (hypertrophy) but will not increase the actual number of muscle fibres.
Being able to maintain a very low body fat percentage is largely determined genetically as well. Those who are ectomorphic will find it much easier to stay lean, while endomorphic individuals are much more prone to fat storage when in a calorie surplus. This is because of the differences in how the individuals' body handles macronutrient metabolism. A large portion of this can be overcome by putting effort into maintaining a strict diet regiment, but the sickest shredded kunts look like that by utilizing extremely strict diets AND having amazing metabolisms.
This does not mean that people with unideal genetics will never accomplish anything in bodybuilding. It simply means those who were not gifted with good genetics will have to work that much harder to accomplish things. If you look at the top natural bodybuilders, these are the guys who have amazing genetics AND work their asses off. People who do not have good genetics will unfortunately never be able to get to that level no matter how hard they work, but it does not mean that they cannot still improve their appearance and even build a respectable physique that others will admire.
Neprisijungęs
- Kano
- Gražulio parankinis
- Registravosi: 2012-06-07
- Žinutės: 2530
- Atsiliepimai: 5
#11114 2013-03-20 20:56
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Ptycka rašė:
Ka manot?
Whether we like it or not, genetics play a monumental role in bodybuilding. For all those people saying that complaining about bad genetics is simply an excuse for poor effort or lack of progress... they really don't know the physiology behind it. Although admittedly, many times people do prematurely blame everything on genetics when it is in fact simply a lack of effort or knowledge.
The only muscle fibers with potential for tangible hypertrophy are type II anaerobic fibres. These are the fibres responsible for short powerful bursts of energy utilizing primarily the ATP-Phosphocreatine energy system. The percentage of your muscle composed of type II fibres (fast twitch, anaerobic) vs type I fibres (slow twitch, oxidative) is entirely determined genetically. Ever noticed that some people are born with a natural propensity for strength/power sports whereas others are naturally better at endurance sports? This is determined by the ratio of fast twitch to slow twitch fiber content in your skeletal muscles. Another thing to keep in mind is that skeletal muscle cells do not undergo mitosis, which means that they do not replicate or produce new cells. This means you cannot change the fibre content of your muscle from what you are genetically born with. Athletic and resistance training can only increase the size of existing type II skeletal muscle (hypertrophy) but will not increase the actual number of muscle fibres.
Being able to maintain a very low body fat percentage is largely determined genetically as well. Those who are ectomorphic will find it much easier to stay lean, while endomorphic individuals are much more prone to fat storage when in a calorie surplus. This is because of the differences in how the individuals' body handles macronutrient metabolism. A large portion of this can be overcome by putting effort into maintaining a strict diet regiment, but the sickest shredded kunts look like that by utilizing extremely strict diets AND having amazing metabolisms.
This does not mean that people with unideal genetics will never accomplish anything in bodybuilding. It simply means those who were not gifted with good genetics will have to work that much harder to accomplish things. If you look at the top natural bodybuilders, these are the guys who have amazing genetics AND work their asses off. People who do not have good genetics will unfortunately never be able to get to that level no matter how hard they work, but it does not mean that they cannot still improve their appearance and even build a respectable physique that others will admire.
Paskutinį kartą taisė Kano (2013-03-20 21:00)
Neprisijungęs
- Ptycka
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Vietovė: Honolulu
- Registravosi: 2008-12-04
- Žinutės: 6275
- Atsiliepimai: 9
#11115 2013-03-20 20:58
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Kano rašė:
Ptycka rašė:
Ka manot?
Whether we like it or not, genetics play a monumental role in bodybuilding. For all those people saying that complaining about bad genetics is simply an excuse for poor effort or lack of progress... they really don't know the physiology behind it. Although admittedly, many times people do prematurely blame everything on genetics when it is in fact simply a lack of effort or knowledge.
The only muscle fibers with potential for tangible hypertrophy are type II anaerobic fibres. These are the fibres responsible for short powerful bursts of energy utilizing primarily the ATP-Phosphocreatine energy system. The percentage of your muscle composed of type II fibres (fast twitch, anaerobic) vs type I fibres (slow twitch, oxidative) is entirely determined genetically. Ever noticed that some people are born with a natural propensity for strength/power sports whereas others are naturally better at endurance sports? This is determined by the ratio of fast twitch to slow twitch fiber content in your skeletal muscles. Another thing to keep in mind is that skeletal muscle cells do not undergo mitosis, which means that they do not replicate or produce new cells. This means you cannot change the fibre content of your muscle from what you are genetically born with. Athletic and resistance training can only increase the size of existing type II skeletal muscle (hypertrophy) but will not increase the actual number of muscle fibres.
Being able to maintain a very low body fat percentage is largely determined genetically as well. Those who are ectomorphic will find it much easier to stay lean, while endomorphic individuals are much more prone to fat storage when in a calorie surplus. This is because of the differences in how the individuals' body handles macronutrient metabolism. A large portion of this can be overcome by putting effort into maintaining a strict diet regiment, but the sickest shredded kunts look like that by utilizing extremely strict diets AND having amazing metabolisms.
This does not mean that people with unideal genetics will never accomplish anything in bodybuilding. It simply means those who were not gifted with good genetics will have to work that much harder to accomplish things. If you look at the top natural bodybuilders, these are the guys who have amazing genetics AND work their asses off. People who do not have good genetics will unfortunately never be able to get to that level no matter how hard they work, but it does not mean that they cannot still improve their appearance and even build a respectable physique that others will admire.Manom kad kalba reiketu paciam paruosti, o nenukopijuoti teksta, kurio niekas nesupras.
Apie ka tu cia?
cia parase vienam forume apie bodybuildingo genetika, cia apie raumenu lasteles , kad pas vienus daugiau pritaikytos istvermei , kitus raumenu auginimui ir to nepakeisi zodziu perskaitys kam idomu.
Neprisijungęs
- Kano
- Gražulio parankinis
- Registravosi: 2012-06-07
- Žinutės: 2530
- Atsiliepimai: 5
#11116 2013-03-20 20:59
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Ptycka rašė:
Kano rašė:
Ptycka rašė:
Ka manot?
Whether we like it or not, genetics play a monumental role in bodybuilding. For all those people saying that complaining about bad genetics is simply an excuse for poor effort or lack of progress... they really don't know the physiology behind it. Although admittedly, many times people do prematurely blame everything on genetics when it is in fact simply a lack of effort or knowledge.
The only muscle fibers with potential for tangible hypertrophy are type II anaerobic fibres. These are the fibres responsible for short powerful bursts of energy utilizing primarily the ATP-Phosphocreatine energy system. The percentage of your muscle composed of type II fibres (fast twitch, anaerobic) vs type I fibres (slow twitch, oxidative) is entirely determined genetically. Ever noticed that some people are born with a natural propensity for strength/power sports whereas others are naturally better at endurance sports? This is determined by the ratio of fast twitch to slow twitch fiber content in your skeletal muscles. Another thing to keep in mind is that skeletal muscle cells do not undergo mitosis, which means that they do not replicate or produce new cells. This means you cannot change the fibre content of your muscle from what you are genetically born with. Athletic and resistance training can only increase the size of existing type II skeletal muscle (hypertrophy) but will not increase the actual number of muscle fibres.
Being able to maintain a very low body fat percentage is largely determined genetically as well. Those who are ectomorphic will find it much easier to stay lean, while endomorphic individuals are much more prone to fat storage when in a calorie surplus. This is because of the differences in how the individuals' body handles macronutrient metabolism. A large portion of this can be overcome by putting effort into maintaining a strict diet regiment, but the sickest shredded kunts look like that by utilizing extremely strict diets AND having amazing metabolisms.
This does not mean that people with unideal genetics will never accomplish anything in bodybuilding. It simply means those who were not gifted with good genetics will have to work that much harder to accomplish things. If you look at the top natural bodybuilders, these are the guys who have amazing genetics AND work their asses off. People who do not have good genetics will unfortunately never be able to get to that level no matter how hard they work, but it does not mean that they cannot still improve their appearance and even build a respectable physique that others will admire.Manom kad kalba reiketu paciam paruosti, o nenukopijuoti teksta, kurio niekas nesupras.
Apie ka tu cia?
![]()
cia parase vienam forume apie bodybuildingo genetika, cia apie raumenu lasteles , kad pas vienus daugiau pritaikytos istvermei , kitus raumenu auginimui ir to nepakeisi zodziu perskaitys kam idomu.
as kelis postus perskaiciau ir kazkaip sugalvojau, kad cia kokia anglu kalbejimo iskaita
Neprisijungęs
- MONX
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Registravosi: 2012-02-13
- Žinutės: 1831
- Atsiliepimai: 1
#11117 2013-03-20 21:04
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Manau aišku yra, kad tas kuris genetiškai yra pranašesnis, turės persvarą prieš kitus, jei visus kitus dalykus (kurių visuma daug svarbesnė yra) atliks vienodai. Tačiau tai tikrai nereiškia, kad visą laiką reikia teisintis bloga genetika ar dar kuo, kai tiesiog neįdedi pakankamai pastangų. Faktiškai atkartojau ką parašė
Neprisijungęs
- uzsivedes
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Vietovė: Vilnius
- Registravosi: 2011-12-18
- Žinutės: 12846
- Atsiliepimai: 34
#11118 2013-03-20 21:31
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Cia tas pats su talentu sportuose - vien su talentu ar genetika toli nenuvaziuosi.
Neprisijungęs
- kiemas
- N-18
- Registravosi: 2010-10-10
- Žinutės: 1639
- Atsiliepimai: 5
#11119 2013-03-20 22:03
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Kiek supratau is staipsnio tai tu raumenu kur uzaugo genetiskai negalima padidinti
Neprisijungęs
- timasis
- Atkaklus dalyvis
- Vietovė: Vilnius
- Registravosi: 2011-03-11
- Žinutės: 183
- Atsiliepimai: 0
#11120 2013-03-20 22:26
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Neprisijungęs
- Flagman
- Išmestas
- Registravosi: 2010-05-01
- Žinutės: 1236
- Atsiliepimai: 1
#11121 2013-03-20 23:43
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Dar jokia kita daina taip testo pries treniruote nekelia kaip sita.
Neprisijungęs
- MrBurbulas
- Shy Gym Rat
- Registravosi: 2011-07-11
- Žinutės: 12860
- Atsiliepimai: 23
#11122 2013-03-21 07:51
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
utiutiu daina, ka tu cia pyzdavojies
opeen your eyeeeessss i seeee youuuuuuu
Neprisijungęs
- gedemas
- Dažnas senbūvis
- Vietovė: norvegija
- Registravosi: 2010-12-29
- Žinutės: 2748
- Įspėjimai: 1
- Atsiliepimai: 4
#11123 2013-03-21 11:43
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Neprisijungęs
- kaRu
- Naujas dalyvis
- Registravosi: 2012-10-16
- Žinutės: 42
- Atsiliepimai: 0
#11124 2013-03-21 12:06
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Neprisijungęs
- naron
- Naujas dalyvis
- Registravosi: 2013-02-21
- Žinutės: 45
- Įspėjimai: 2
- Atsiliepimai: 0
#11125 2013-03-21 12:35
Re: Blevyzgos II dalis
Neprisijungęs