Kulturizmas.net diskusijų forumas

A Serbian Film

The Serbian state investigated the film for crime against sexual morals and crime related to the protection of minors. The film has been banned in Spain, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, and Norway, and temporarily banned from screening in Brazil.

Čia reik pamatyt, neprikomentuosi daug...

Wiliukazz rašė:

A Serbian Film

The Serbian state investigated the film for crime against sexual morals and crime related to the protection of minors. The film has been banned in Spain, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, and Norway, and temporarily banned from screening in Brazil.

Čia reik pamatyt, neprikomentuosi daug...

ziurejau, pieva

Building rašė:

Wiliukazz rašė:

A Serbian Film

The Serbian state investigated the film for crime against sexual morals and crime related to the protection of minors. The film has been banned in Spain, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, and Norway, and temporarily banned from screening in Brazil.

Čia reik pamatyt, neprikomentuosi daug...

ziurejau, pieva

Čia, kad suprastum tą pievą:

Explanation by the film's creator

Spasojević and Radivojević, have stated that the film is a parody of modern politically correct films made in Serbia, which are financially supported by foreign funds. When asked why they chose the title 'Srpski Film' for the film's name, Radivojević answered, "We have become synonyms for chaos and lunacy. The title is a cynical reference to that image. Srpski Film is also a metaphor for our national cinema — boring, predictable and altogether unintentionally hilarious which throughout our film to some extent is commented on and subtly parodied." Similarly, Radivojević describes Serbian cinema as "...pathetic state financed films made by people who have no sense or connection to film, but are strongly supported by foreign funds. Quality of the film is not their concern, only the bureaucratic upholding of the rule book on political correctness."[50]

According to Spasojević, the character of Vukmir is "an exaggerated representation of the new European film order ... In Eastern Europe, you cannot get your film financed unless you have a barefoot girl who cries on the streets, or some story about war victims in our region ... the Western world has lost feelings, so they're searching for false ones, they want to buy feelings."[33]

In another interview Spasojević is quoted as saying the film "denounces the fascism of political correctness." Questioned by the Croatian media on whether the violence depicted deals with crimes committed by Serbian soldiers during the Yugoslav Wars, Spasojević answered, "'Srpski Film' does not touch upon war themes, but in a metaphorical way deals with the consequences of postwar society and a man that is exploited to the extreme in the name of securing the survival of his family."[51]

Iki to filmo nebuvau net pagalvojes kad su stacia byrka galima isdurti aki mirtinai

jazzmatazz rašė:

Iki to filmo nebuvau net pagalvojes kad su stacia byrka galima isdurti aki mirtinai

tai turbūt kad...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0206634/

nlb supratau, kodel taip gerai ivertintas..

Kano

Kadanors suprasi

Audrius rašė:

Matet gal kas Fist fight, The Great Wall, Emilija iš Laisvės alėjos ar Fifty shades darker?

Rimtai? Nebent turi drauge, kuri grasina neduot utiutiu menesi, jei neisi kartu paziuret, tada tik sita filma ideciau i ziurimu sarasa.. Nors dar kazi kas blogiau ar but nepisus menesi ar ziuret sita filma.

Buttercup rašė:

Audrius rašė:

Matet gal kas Fist fight, The Great Wall, Emilija iš Laisvės alėjos ar Fifty shades darker?

Rimtai? Nebent turi drauge, kuri grasina neduot utiutiu menesi, jei neisi kartu paziuret, tada tik sita filma ideciau i ziurimu sarasa.. Nors dar kazi kas blogiau ar but nepisus menesi ar ziuret sita filma.

tu nesigilink, as klausiau kas ka mate ir kaip?

Audrius rašė:

Wiliukazz rašė:

Buttercup rašė:

Rimtai? Nebent turi drauge, kuri grasina neduot utiutiu menesi, jei neisi kartu paziuret, tada tik sita filma ideciau i ziurimu sarasa.. Nors dar kazi kas blogiau ar but nepisus menesi ar ziuret sita filma.

patys aktoriai lyg sako, kad daugiau ten neifilmuos, nes nesamone, tai kaip dar ji tada ziuret?

as buvau su drauge kine pirmoj daly, abiem nepatiko...

tai ko eit i antra

Kano rašė:

jazzmatazz rašė:

Kano

Kadanors suprasi

Vienintelis logiskas paaiskinimas del tokio auksto balo tai turbut butu perdetas susizavejimas futuristines distopijos filmais. Yra nemazai filmu kuriuos as tikrai ziurejau su malonumu, bet jie toli grazu nebuvo nebuvo high class.. taip kad nereiketu filmo vertint vien tik pagal jo ideja, o paziuret truputi placiau.   O tesiant toliau... logikos nebuvimas, per daug neatsakytu klausimu, prastoka vaidyba, personazai labai pavirsutiniski, silpnas scenarijus ir pats jo ispildymas.

Na jis aukšto balo vertas jau vien dėl tos vienos paskutinių scenų. Mūšio mieste. Kai viskas buvo nufilmuota "vienu paėmimu".

Volframas rašė:

Kano rašė:

jazzmatazz rašė:

Kano

Kadanors suprasi

Vienintelis logiskas paaiskinimas del tokio auksto balo tai turbut butu perdetas susizavejimas futuristines distopijos filmais. Yra nemazai filmu kuriuos as tikrai ziurejau su malonumu, bet jie toli grazu nebuvo nebuvo high class.. taip kad nereiketu filmo vertint vien tik pagal jo ideja, o paziuret truputi placiau.   O tesiant toliau... logikos nebuvimas, per daug neatsakytu klausimu, prastoka vaidyba, personazai labai pavirsutiniski, silpnas scenarijus ir pats jo ispildymas.

Na jis aukšto balo vertas jau vien dėl tos vienos paskutinių scenų. Mūšio mieste. Kai viskas buvo nufilmuota "vienu paėmimu".

imho tai filmo balas turi susideti is veiksiu visumos, o cia prikibti galima prie daug ko. Aisku nera jis labai prastas, bet mano manymu, pervertintas.